Historical analysis of college campus interracial dating are kristin and justin still dating

Rated 3.92/5 based on 844 customer reviews

The problem, the historian Nell Irvin Painter explains, is that the history of slavery helped construct the idea of the white race in contradictory ways.

On the one hand, “Americans traditionally associate whiteness with freedom and blackness with slavery.” On the other, “Caucasian” as “a designation for white people originates in concepts of beauty related to the white slave trade from eastern Europe, and whiteness remains embedded in visions of beauty found in art history and popular culture.”[8] Although race has no scientific basis, “Americans cling to race as the unschooled cling to superstition.”[9] White Americans tend to remain ignorant both of the fact that we are socialized racially and that there are contradictions between self-professed claims to values of equality and the ways we actually live in the 21st century.

Not only is white different from non-white, it is, in the court’s view, the intellectual, moral, and socially superior opposite.In this way the law shaped procreative choices and who would be married to whom, reinforcing legal segregation in housing, public accommodations, and commerce. Supreme Court established precedents, or “prerequisite” cases that delineated who should and should not be eligible for naturalization.This historical background is critical because the contemporary spatial segregation of U. metropolitan areas along racial and class lines did not happen in a vacuum. The legal scholar Ian Haney Lopez draws our attention to a body of 52 cases decided between the Civil War and 1952 that demarcated who should or should not become a citizen.The philosopher Charles Mills calls this ignorance an inverted, or perverse, way of knowing in which whites “will in general be unable to understand the world they themselves have made.”[10] White Americans often tell people of color to “get over the past.” In doing so, whites miss James Baldwin admonition that “History, as no one seems to know, is not merely something to be read.And it does not refer merely, or even principally, to the past.

Leave a Reply